|
[VIEWED 3086
TIMES]
|
SAVE! for ease of future access.
|
|
|
|
nightcrawler
Please log in to subscribe to nightcrawler's postings.
Posted on 04-11-07 12:40
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
|
| |
to those of you who are following the cricket right now,: they are taking lunch right now!!!,lol, why couldn"t they eat 1 hr ago between the innings , not in the middle of the game!!!!!!.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
who??O.K
Please log in to subscribe to who??O.K's postings.
Posted on 04-11-07 12:48
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
| Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
I was thinkin the same 21 for 1 ... that was an early strike for the tigers... dangerman ian bell... wouldnt be surprised if they restrict england ...on the chase.
|
| |
|
|
Prakash_Ji
Please log in to subscribe to Prakash_Ji's postings.
Posted on 04-11-07 12:50
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
| Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
They would eat but umpires wouldn't allow. When First Inning completes well ahead of scheduled time, few overs of second innings are played. I have seen this thing happening in lots of games. And don't you think this is normal. Who ever provides the meal must have been told to bring it in at some specific time. So how would they eat 1 hour before the scheduled time?
|
| |
|
|
CaMoFLaGeD
Please log in to subscribe to CaMoFLaGeD's postings.
Posted on 04-11-07 12:54
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
| Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
.Its because the mgmt expects each team play whole 50 overs. If a team is all out in 35 overs then another team has to play till the lunch in ready in the kitchen. You know what I mean, right? I hope Bangladesh will bounce back with the ball. :-)
|
| |
