I love and admire communism and everything that it stands for. I usually do not like to work so I need a government that will take care of me regardless of my education and efforts. The entrepreneurs that take risks to start a business are fools, I hate them. Why should they have more money just because they risked everything that they had for an idea? Let's hope that their business fail otherwise we need to tax these types of people to death. A communist government will take care of you and your families. In few months after the Maoist officially run the government, petrol will be free, rice will be free, and schools will be free. During dashain they will deliver a goat to your house. Communism is the only solution. Look at the great nations like Cuba and North Korea, there is not even a single starving person. Everyone wants to immigrate to these great nations. Has anyone ever in their right mind considered immigrating to the US, the UK, South Korea, Japan or any of the so called Western countries? None, no-one. I'm here sitting at a cafe in North Korea drinking some wine and trying to educate you so called capitalist pigs(by the way the internet access is provided for free by the government and so is the wine) about the greatness about Marx and Lenin. So what if they killed millions of people, it is because of their foresight that they were able to win the Cold war. In the last decade China has been slowly moving towards being a capitalist country and as you can see they are worse off now than they were 50 years ago. The capitalist government even offered their women to Western countries for rice, the communist regime never did that (see link below).

http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/02/14/chinese.women.ap/index.html

So fellas sit back and relax, just be glad that we are alive to see this day. All you suckers who studied hard and did your homeworks on time got what you deserved. You are not going to make more than my comrades. I told you it was a waste of time and asked you to join me and support the communist.

One last comment, I don't remember the name but there was this idiot who said, "Capitalism provides unequal level of prosperity and communism provides equal level of misery". That fool should be shot to death.

 

 

HAHAHA..Simply great PISSA SCHIT.. Just kidding

Positive Carry, I just read the article and regret for the earlier comment.  Alls good!!

Positive carry
Great satirical note to communists.

 sarcasam at its best..

Chill out Samsara, that was supposed to be a satarical post. There are more people dying of starvation in N Korea than in any other country in Asia. If you would read the whole thing, I said I am in N Korea in a cafe using free internet, there is no such thing there!!!

It's nice to see someone here that hates commies as much as I do.

Yes, I read the post later and found it out.  My bad!  You were just a few seconds early. 

Samsara, thats what you do. You respond in your sick mother tongue withhout even reading the topic, let alone understanding anything about it.

lets see what happens, shall we?

Great for us who are lucky to be born with well to do family. Poors did not have any place in Nepal. Communism thrives in poverty. that's what is happening in Nepal. Hope this century won't creat on new fail state in a name of communism. Maoist must scrap communism for betterment of country. They don't need Communism to develop country. A good will  and act is sufficient.   A few good leaders  that what Nepal lounged for.  May Democracy, not communism, prevails in Nepal.

My roommate goes to work at 4 in the morning and works about 16 hours a day, but that miser is not willing to pay my rent. Can you beleive this, comrades? I wish we were in Nepal so that we could take all his money. Just because he works longer hours, he thinks he deserves to keep the money and not have to share it. We'll get his money somehow. He said that he is making all these sacrifices so that he can save and start a small business in Nepal. What a fool........

Positive Carry, why is he not paying your share of the rent?  This is outrageous!!  Post up his name here on sajha so we could publicly humiliate him!  Seriously, just because he works longer hours, does he think he's better than peeps like you who haven't had a job for the past 3 years now?  Its ablout time to nationalize the Bank that holds his money so all we birojgar folks could let the benevolent central govt plunder it and throw some chump change along our paths.  LOLs 

I think some people here do not understand what does nationalization of Banks mean. It is not bad idea. In Nepal also, as one of the means to financial reforms, government can do nationalization of Bank, not only bank but of any property by offering a fair compensation to the party from whom the property is taken. Such property acquired from a private party should be used for Public interests and in legal understanding it is called 'Eminent Domain of State'. It is not uncommon practice around the world.

Now, the Banks are not nationalized to distribute the money deposited to it. Like in India, Banks were nationalised to ease the flow of loans to agricultural sector as the study found that Banks were giving Loans only to Corporate Sector. It was not for any distribution and it can not be anywhere.

hey samsara why are you so hell-bent on using words like those. are you trying to be a ghetto bro or what? your abusive language is simply disgusting. just because you don't agree to someone's views, you heap your trashy comments over the other person.

btw. nepal will be a switzerland in ten years from now. let's keep on dreaming.

Nationalization of property is not Communist or Socialist Agenda. The Nationalization or not depends on the need of the time, rather than based on any ideology. I am not advocating any sorts of nationalisation here; it can be done in Nepal even today if the situation demands. rather than from the ideology point of view, nationalisation should be taken from the economic need of any state.

This can be done by any government irrespective of from which ideology it comes. Certainly, Congress in India is not any communist but it is guided by the principle of socialism as enshrined in Indian Constitution's preamble. If our Constitution makers decide to make Nepal a socialist state, Nationalisation of property is not a new thing. Even in Capitalistic state, nationalisation for public good/interests is always justified.

India did not be any superpower within a night. In India, still many many people are poor and if various measures taken by Smt. Indira Gandhi were not taken way back in 1970s, India's economy would be so dismal even today. Smt Gandhi reduced the gap between prices and pauper and focussed on fair distribution of wealth incorporating various economic policies. That made the foundation to open Economy after 1990.

In Nepal, there should be the mixed economy-open market, Free Enterprises and Possession of Private Property. I do not think New Govt will deviate from these priciples but when required, Nationalisation can be a good option, undoubtedly!

I think someone deleted his post here. But, that really does not matter.

Looks like the media censoring has begun!  Where is my earlier post, damn commies??  I'm outta this thread for good!!

I think someone deleted his post here. But, that really does not matter.

so does the pictures tell and never lies too...

 

then we have but to ....love the so called people choice of  love communism....!!

no man.

itihas jitneharu ko lagi ho.

i don't know how the maoists won, but now a lot of khaobadis and others would be maobadis. they will grow even more.

i feel really bad now. maybe the peace deal between the spa and the maoists was a very bad idea of the sevenparty alliance. those pussies from the spa could not even show any resistance to anything the Maoists said, went behind them, took up their election slogans, and we know now the result.

after the elections are over, let's see the educational qualification of the maoist representatives.

i also want to hear prachanda talk in english. anyone any videos?