One of the main goals of sajha.com is to help Nepalis help each other.

If someone needs help or is asking a serious question, please help sajha by replying only if you have an answer or pointers to possible help. Please feel free to start your own thread but please do not post reply if you cannot be of help.

hahaha good one BC. although i had to accept that annoying agreement to reply.

I thought that was a total BS too. It's like as if Sajha wants to manipulate our opinions.

"One of the main goals of sajha.com is to help Nepalis help each other"- sounds totally gay....

I wonder what rest of the main goals like??

I have seen few threads lately where the poster is looking for a valid answer to his/her problem, and there are replies which ridicule the poster or make fun of his/her problem or simply unrelated stuff.

I am sure each person visiting the site has their own expectations out of sajha, but for me it is important that a visitor does not feel too apprehensive about posting a simple query in sajha kurakani. When simple queries are met with unreasonable or hostile replies, visitors are alienated from posting their issues - which is contrary to what kurakani is here for.

I feel that the agreement box deters people to some extent from replying unrelated information. In the next few days, I am automating this box to only appear on threads that have a question mark or word "help" or some keywords that classify the post as a help request. So rest assured that this box will not show up on every thread :)

If some people feel comfortable in/with sajha enough to ask questions to solve their problems then they deserve the same respect from sajha to be treated fairly and with respect.

Thank you for your kind consideration in this matter.

the originator can delete such (unwanted) responses

the new feature cannot stop deviations from the original topic

Yes San you are right. I have got many helpful replies from sajha in the past and that is what a questioner expects. If the thread is posted as a question or a help me topic, at least the person who just wants to make fun of the originator will think twice before clicking "I agree". But for normal kurakani threads, this is not needed and is just a nuisance .

The originator can delete such unwanted responses but most likely the originator will
 
a. feel offended
b. feel he/she shouldn't have bothered
c. delete his/her own posting because it seems to invite unrelated sarcastic comments
d. never post again
e. do all of above

Lot of us in sajha have been here for a long time and have a thick skin as far as tolerating comments but there are many new users who may not feel the same way, and we need to be considerate of all kinds of users who can benefit from sajha.

I'm sure you understand

San,
I agree with you.
For those who reply seriously, 'one click' shouldn't be too much!
And those write BS, will write again.

Dear San bro!!!

I agree with BC 100%. I think you need to let the originator of a thread take steps to delete the unwanted comments. You even have the notify admin and flagging system in place. i don't see the purpose of those functions in if you are going to implement the new system. people will always make fun and critisize and comment in public forums such as sajha. if you are looking to police it around then i dont think sajha stands for what i had believed it stood for.

This is one those that will go away after San realizes that it does not work...

BC i think you can ban san from this thread. he is not helping your cause at all

haha chor ko khutta kaat bhanda Cyberlegend le aapatti janayo lol. He's the guy who's always posting crap replies. of course he's gonna be crying foul play.

you take things too personally racist! people like you are the reason why people like me are popular ..fank u fery mooch!.

San,
I think sajha can serve a lot more people but unfortunately it is been abused by people like cyberlegend who treat it like their personal playground saying anything in their mind to people who are looking for help.
Instead of putting this kind of agreement statement, you should directly ban such users who are turning away many people.

yeah san i literally forced people to read my post and made em cry!! i pushed people out and deprived em from receiving any sort of help...to be honest i have this gift eeehh a supernatural power where i can control minds of people who read my comment and banish them from sajha...it's a sweet power to have meeyan!

Cyberlegend needs psychological help. Don't ban him. Who knows what he's going to do.

oh yeah please don't ban me...this is what i live for...if you ban me i will kill myself jumping off a bridge.

chor ko khutta kaat lol

I agree. We already have a system in place for that. We need to educate people more on how to use it. The flagging works people. You would think a small, mostly intelligent community like sajha should be able to flag posts and remove them from the thread but I have yet to see posts being deleted.
And the ability of the thread creator to delete comments is absurd, I think. Once a thread has been created, it is for everyone to see and respond to. I think the only thing a user should be able to do is to edit his/her post, while still displaying what was edited. Ability to delete post and users not flagging irrelevant post is what is causing sajha to look like a mental asylum sometimes. If you are going to ban, let the people decide who is to be banned. When someone's post is continually being flagged (maybe if 10 unique posts by the user has been flagged by at least 10 different users), ban them. Don't just pick and choose who you want to ban. That would be a better solution I think.

TL;DR - decrease the number from 20 to 10 flags for a post to be deleted. Ban a user if 10 unique posts has been deleted due to excessive flagging.