We've known Hillary for long time, her charity works towards numerous other humanitarian issues etc.
1. She gave and delivered a kickass commencement speech at Wellesley College in 1969.
2. She was one of 27 women who graduated from Yale Law School in 1973, out of a class of 235.
3. She was the only woman on the Nixon impeachment investigation team.
4. She cofounded the Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families advocacy group.
5. She broke the mold for first ladies with her speech at the 1995 United Nations Women's Conference in China.
6. She won a Grammy for the audio edition of her book, It Takes a Village.
7. She worked with Ted Kennedy to expand the Children's Health Insurance Program.
8. She won the most votes of any female presidential candidate in history.
9. She set the stage for Obamacare by pushing health care reform in the '90s and during the 2008 campaign.
10. She became the most-traveled U.S. secretary of state ever.
11. She set into motion the first American talks with Iran since the 1979 revolution.

Now who is Bernie Sanders, I don't know, I really don't know and to me he popped up suddenly out of nowhere. If you are partaking in a match, there has to be someone to compete with. I believe any contenders to Hillary are just those out there just for the sake of it(match aka debate). And for someone like me when I saw him suddenly on TV saying that he's getting donation for his campaign not from billionaires but public. People paid standing ovation with round of applause, so? so what's the point? Does that make him saint? But to lot of people that made sense and now he's everyone's' talk of the night. Yes, there are things that make lot of sense to people. The same people who would believe they're getting free Ipad on some fake facebook page of real publication, the same people who follow Trump the maniac, the same fans who would like/share tweets of their drughigh fav singer who claims earth is flat, the same people who resend/retext/reshare religious messages out of fear(do this or curse would happen type), the same people who argues Ron Paul's gold theory must come back in action, the same people who believe and sell all their belongings in the name of judgment day only to turn into homeless next day, seriously I sometimes think how gullible we are to think whatever we hear and see are the truths. Bernie Sanders is another hype to me. Few videos on youtube found me the guy was a big time critique of democratic party itself, and didn't spare Obama policy from criticizing. I am afraid of sweet talkers and often time they're the back stabbers.

In all honesty, I really can't trust this Bernie dude and it seems like how honestly he's saying his things, Hillary is the way to go. Campaigns can't be run without money, however way you get it, you need money. He'll be in billionaire's pocket too if he's to get presidency. Those who think he's not going to be, are just type of people I mentioned in a paragraph above this.

If you are OBAMA supporters, VOTE for Hillary, if you are not VOTE for bernie.

Good Luck.

I'm seeing Hillary Clinton as the next president of the United States of America.

को हुन् The American Democracy Legal Fund का सस्थापक डेबिड ब्रक ?

सन् 1990 दसकको सुरूका बर्षहरुमा दक्क्षिण पन्थी पत्रकारका रुपमा The American Spectator जस्ता दक्क्षिण पन्थी पत्रिकामा बिल क्लिन्टन बिरूद्द सन्सनी पुर्न लेख लेखी अनेक scandal खडा गर्न कुनै कसर नछाड्ने यीनी सन् 1990 दसकको अनत्य तीर ब्यक्तिगत शक्ति, पद तथा प्रभुत्व कायम गर्ने लोभमा यीनले छेपारोले झै रंङ फेरे ।

दक्क्षिण पन्थी शक्ति केन्द्रहरू बाट कुनै खासै ठुलो ब्यक्तिगत लाभ हासील नहुने देखी यीनी सन् 1990 दसकको अनत्य तीर Democratic Party नीकट शक्ति केन्द्रहरू धाउन थाले । आखीर यीनी बिल तथा हिलारी क्लिन्टनका प्रिय पात्र बन्न दक्क्षिण पन्थी बिरूद्द खनिएर लागे । बिल तथा हिलारी क्लिन्टनका प्रिय पात्र बन्न केही हद सम्म यीनी सफल पनी बने । The American Democracy Legal Fund जस्ता dark money funded सस्था मार्फत यीनी सन् 2016 को चुनाबी चहलपहल सुरु भएयता बर्नी स्यानडर्स बिरूद्द खनिएर लागपरेका छन् ।

हिलारी क्लिन्टन राष्ट्रपति बन्न सफल भए यीनी गतिलै सरकारी पदाधिकारी वा राजदुत वा ठुलै योजना आयोगको प्रमुख बनी आफ्नो ब्यक्तिगत शक्ति तथा प्रभुत्व बडाउने दाउमा रहेको आभास मिलेकको छ ।

GT bro, Was all day out, and couldn't really copy paste out of my cell phone the way I wanted. breitbart.com is a pretty damn legit site. That guy breitbart after he died in San Francisco, I thought site was gonna get shut down otherwise I used to check that site quite frequently and they always served best news and articles. Don't know what made you think that it's not a legit site. I read through the article and yes, Donald Trump would make a great president. He's not a deal breaker, he's a deal maker and like I have been saying to my white co-workers, if I were born in the US, I would have voted for him and they're like 'really?' and when I tell them why and talk them patriotism if I were born and raised in this country, they go 'ummmm' , kind of like in acknowledgment. But their mind is too liberal to digest what I say but they can't deny it. The reason I don't want Trump to be president is because am an legal immigrant and that dude have policies which scare the shit out of every folks like you and me. People say he doesn't have experience on foreign policies and all that, but that's when VP and political advisers come into play. You see, when your mind is dumb fckd so deep by only one propaganda you fail to see the light beyond the fog. Look at me, am an ardent Hillary supporter, yes I write literature upon literature to not vote for bernie, though I don't back up from praising positive aspect of that old bernie dude. If my brain was on 'deep freeze' like yours, I would have cussed the fck out of that article on breitbart.com coz it wrote 'Trump would make a great president' but no, my mind and my heart is not as closed as yours. I don't get limited and stuck not to say what is supposed to be said and the truth is he would make a great president, but for his fellow americans not for us—immigrants. Down the road, I would say always 'No To Trump' for president.

And, yes dailynewsbin.com, is not a fake site, it's real and genuine folks writing it. They've their news sourced by many major news agencies like CNNs, etc. What made you think that the link I posted from them was crap? It is because you see only bernie, and nothing else. Your brain is pretty must whited out by his sweet talks that you lost your analytical ability to judge things around. I remember you once admitted that you are so influenced by his idealism and policies, you regard him highly to the level you would submit yourself to him to be his slave for life. Do you know what that is called? 'Bootlicker'.

It's easier to say and write things without properly knowing about the subject matter. But when truth comes to bite at you, then you realize how big of a fool you made yourself.

Yes, Hillary said one thing 5-10 years ago, and now she's different stand on the same issues she once had different take on. She acknowledges it and explain why. If you ever care to listen to her 'Why' then you would realize? But nope, your crazed mind is occupied with bernie fever, who wasn't even a democrat until early 2015, signs up to be a democrat, uses DNC to level up his political status and now all of sudden there is no liberal and democratic like him. Seriously? Hillary has foundation spread all across Asia, which helps poor and needy, even people in remote villages of Nepal and suddenly she's an evil witch. Show me, wth bernie has accomplished till date? nothing except vouching on same consistent rants of his.

I'm not gonna judge you by saying that you are taking on wrong side, it's your choice after all but stop being overly critical, be little bit open minded and that definitely shines your already noble personality to higher extent.

Amidst the overall meltdown today at the Clark County nomination convention in Nevada, which saw multiple delegates apparently shifted from Hillary Clinton to Bernie Sanders amid accusations that chairwoman Christine Kramar was cheating on behalf of the Sanders campaign, she had a meltdown of her own. Caught on camera, Kramar walked into a meeting where the Executive Board was supposed to be deciding her fate. She staged a sit-in, demanding that she be arrested, before ultimately leaving and throwing the bird at her own office.

In a six minute video posted to YouTube, Kramar begins making her case to the Executive Board, some of whom admit they’re not even sure what the accusations are against her. But rather than stating her case, she almost immediately demands that one of the board members physically remove her, trying to physically goad him into a confrontation, before sitting down on the floor and asking the rest of the room to join her in singing “We shall overcome” and sit on the floor with her. They all declined, with one asking her to stop acting in such a fashion.

After finally being told by a building maintenance man that they all needed to leave the building because it was after-hours and was closing down, she claimed she was being “trespassed.” One board member sought out the camera and made fun of her for “drama.” As Kramar was walking out, she threw two middle fingers. Perhaps this is what the bird that landed on Bernie Sanders last week was really signifying? Watch the bizarre meltdown below:

Celebrities rooting for Hillary
--------------------------------

Abby Wambach

Abbi Jacobson

Spike Lee

Lena Dunham

Katy Perry

Cher

Kerry Washington

George Clooney

Ja Rule

Robert De Niro

Beyonce

Kim Kardashian

Magic Johnson

Pharrell

Salma Hayek

America Ferrera

Bill Gates

Tim Cook

Mark Zuckerberg
and list goes on and on...

Uzo Aduba — The actress from Netflix’s hit “Orange is the New Black” tweeted her support for Clinton.

Clay Aiken — The “American Idol” who fell short in his own bid for Congress last year initially panned Clinton’s announcement video on Twitter. “Hillary, I love you. But why are you the stiffest and most scripted looking person in this video,” he wrote. He confirmed his support for Clinton in a later tweet.

Kat Dennings — The “2 Broke Girls” actress tweeted “Hillary” after Clinton’s announcement.

Lena Dunham — The “Girls” creator and star took to Instagram to post the famous picture of Clinton reading her BlackBerry. Dunham’s caption read: “This is Hillary reading a text from me that says, ‘With you every step of the way, gurl’ #mypresident.”

Jesse Tyler Ferguson — Playing off Clinton’s announcement tweet, the “Modern Family” star wrote, “I have an announcement: I’m not running for president. Yay #Hillary2016!”

America Ferrera — The former “Ugly Betty” star, who stumped for Clinton in 2008, is back in her camp. “I believed in her then, I believe in her now,” she wrote on Twitter.

Ellie Goulding — The singer tweeted “Hillary” after Clinton announced her bid.

Ariana Grande — The pop star tweeted “yaaas @hillaryclinton” after Clinton’s announcement.

Abbi Jacobson — The comedian and “Broad City” creator tweeted a picture of herself with a Hillary Clinton mask titled, “HERE WE GO @HillaryClinton!”

Magic Johnson — “I feel @HillaryClinton will be a great President for the American people and she will make sure that everyone has a voice!” the former Los Angeles Lakers point guard said on Twitter. Johnson hosted a Clinton fundraiser in 2007.

Carole King — The Grammy Award-winning singer-songwriter kept it short, saying “I’m in,” posting a link to Clinton’s announcement tweet.

Diane Kruger — The German-born actress and recently naturalized U.S. citizen posted a picture of Clinton on Instagram, saying “Please America, make her President!”

Padma Lakshmi — The “Top Chef” host tweeted art of Clinton as Rosie the Riveter in the classic “We can do it!” image. “Oh yes, it will finally happen. #Hillary2016,” she added.

Jennifer Lopez — “I’m very excited by the news. I think it’s time for a woman,” the actress and singer told E! about Clinton at the MTV Movie Awards.

Josh Peck — The former “Drake and Josh” star tweeted, “Hillary’s mah Homie.”

Amy Poehler — The “Parks and Recreation” star posted a gif of her and Clinton from her Saturday Night Live days, adding: “Let’s do this. #Hillary2016 @HillaryClinton.”

RuPaul — The drag queen and host of “RuPaul’s Drag Race” tweeted a play on his own song lyrics, saying, “You betta work, @HillaryClinton!”

Kerry Washington — The “Scandal” actress shared her support of Clinton in an interview with Entertainment Tonight. “I’m very thrilled. I’m excited for her, and I’m sure I’ll be hitting the stump trail,” she said. Washington stumped for Barack Obama during his 2012 reelection campaign.

Olivia Wilde — A one-time supporter of Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) for president, the “House” actress told The Daily Beast that Clinton’s position on healthcare reform and women’s rights helped win her over. “The fact that she feels the plight of women and girls as the most important issue of the 21st century is a huge reason why I’m supporting her,” Wilde said.

Jeffrey Wright — Wright, who appeared in “The Hunger Games” and HBO’s “Boardwalk Empire,” shared Clinton’s announcement video on Twitter. “Nice inclusive portrait of America

Hillary Clinton appeared on NBC’s Meet The Press on Sunday morning, and spent some time railing against her rival, Bernie Sanders, for his misrepresenting her record on fossil fuels. Clinton also said she feels “sorry” for the Sanders supporters who believe the lies.

On Wednesday, Clinton was confronted by a Greenpeace activist about receiving donations from the fossil fuel industry, Clinton famously said, “I am so sick of the Sanders campaign lying about me!”

The Washington Post‘s fact-check concluded that Clinton and the Super PAC supporting her received money from lobbyists tied to that industry…the Super PAC received $3.25 million…but said that the claims from Team Sanders are “exaggerated” and awarded them 3 “Pinocchios”. On CNN this morning, Sanders defended the attacks and said it’s not “distorting reality” to point out that lobbyists for that industry are giving as much as they can to help his opponent and trying to bundle more.

When host Chuck Todd asked about the attacks, Clinton said, “When people make these kinds of claims, which now I think have been debunked –Actually the Washington Post said “Three Pinocchios”– and the New York Times analyzed it. Independent analysts have said that they are misrepresenting my record. I’m just not going to…I feel sorry sometimes for the young people who believe this, they don’t do their own research. I’m glad we can now point to reliable, independent analysis to say: No. It is just not true.”

New York is a closed primary state which means independents cannot vote for any Democrat on ballot. Independents have swayed largely towards Bernie which means Clinton has structural advantage in New York, not to mention it's her home state and its two term Senator. But, it's no longer a sure thing for Clinton.

"And more importantly, it’s Donald Trump’s turf, too. If Hillary thinks wagging her finger at an innocent young Greenpeace activist is rough, wait until she hears the taunts from Trump for losing their beloved home state. Especially if the blustery billionaire wins the GOP side of the ballot. Talk about bragging rights." - Boston Herald

A Heart In New York - Simon & Garfunkel

She wasn't really pointing fingers at innocent activist, it was a direct stare and yell to bernie camp. Anyone who thought she was actually mad at that girl, well, good luck to your conscience. Bernie can't win New York. He simply doesn't have any chance. This win for Hillary would seal her nomination.

Meanwhile at South Bronx, NY.

The absurdity of debate over where and when to debate seems to have been finally settled. It's on April 14 — five days before the New York primary.

Hopefully, the debate won't be as contentious as the debate over the debate.

Bernie Sanders, on the other hand, is portrayed as a revolutionary who stands in contrast to Hillary’s perceived incrementalism.

But in an interview with the editorial board of the New York Daily News, Bernie exposed the limits of being a big picture candidate who doesn’t concern himself with policy details.

Pressed to provide specifics on his oft-repeated proposal to break up the banks, Bernie was asked: “How do you go about doing it?”

Sanders: How you go about doing it is having legislation passed, or giving the authority to the secretary of treasury to determine, under Dodd-Frank, that these banks are a danger to the economy over the problem of too-big-to-fail.

Daily News: But do you think that the Fed, now, has that authority?

Sanders: Well, I don’t know if the Fed has it. But I think the administration can have it.

Daily News: How? How does a President turn to JPMorgan Chase, or have the Treasury turn to any of those banks and say, “Now you must do X, Y and Z?”

Sanders: Well, you do have authority under the Dodd-Frank legislation to do that, make that determination.

Daily News: You do, just by Federal Reserve fiat, you do?

Sanders: Yeah. Well, I believe you do.

The exchange went on, until the Daily News interviewer confessed: “I’m a little bit confused, because just a few minutes ago you said the U.S. President would have the authority to order—” At which point, Bernie interrupted:

Sanders: No, I did not say we would order. I did not say that we would order. The President is not a dictator.

Daily News: Okay. You would then leave it to JPMorgan Chase or the others to figure out how to break it, themselves up. I’m not quite…

Sanders: You would determine is that, if a bank is too big to fail, it is too big to exist. And then you have the secretary of treasury and some people who know a lot about this, making that determination. If the determination is that Goldman Sachs or JPMorgan Chase is too big to fail, yes, they will be broken up.

Daily News: Okay. You saw, I guess, what happened with Metropolitan Life. There was an attempt to bring them under the financial regulatory scheme, and the court said no. And what does that presage for your program?

Sanders: It’s something I have not studied, honestly, the legal implications of that.

Barney Frank: Support for Sanders reflects a 'lack of information' Supporters of Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders are unrealistic about what the independent Vermont senator can achieve if elected president, former Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) argued Monday. “I think it is a lack of information, to be honest,” he said on “MSNBC Live with Jose Diaz-Balart” when asked why Sanders is resonating with voters. “You have people, I believe, who do not understand how hard it is to make change. [It is] the importance of not just being idealistic, but being sensibly pragmatic and keeping their ideals. Sanders is getting their support.” Frank said some of the voters who are frustrated with the Democratic establishment have unrealistic expectations about what a president can deliver. “You have people who don’t understand, frankly, the nature of the American political system,” he said. "It’s the separation of powers. “It takes — because of the Constitution, not because of any one individual — two elections to get a governing majority in America,” added Frank, who has endorsed Clinton. “People are reluctant to blame themselves, [and] people like to find somebody else to blame, so now they’re saying, 'Sanders pointed out it’s the system’s fault.' I think that’s unfortunate.” Frank criticized Sanders for repeatedly challenging President Obama’s accomplishments during his time in office. “If you look at what Bernie Sanders is saying, he’s far more critical of Barack Obama objectively than Hillary Clinton,” he said. "The healthcare bill — that’s President Obama. His view on the inadequacy of financial reform is President Obama.” Frank added that he thinks GOP presidential front-runner Donald Trump’s campaign is losing steam with voters. “I’m afraid Trump’s collapsing more quickly than I had hoped because he’d be a great one to run against. Although it’s a good sign he’s collapsing, because of America."

Bernie can have Wisconson. NewYork? keep dreaming

'Bernies' are BumFuckled.

Micro, Keep wasting your time, you are not allowed to write on this thread.
Without reading, your posts will be deleted.
This thread is only for decent people with logical argument, not low-class dirtbags like you.
Please don't mind. And yes, don't expect me to read anything you write. I only see 'delete' on top of your comment there, nothing else. It'll be just a waste of your time.
Thanks.

Well Bernie supporters can be good as well...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YF3Ja-Mxrb4

Let's put aside all bitterness and favors towards each candidate.Let's be realistic. No doubt, Bernie has been winning last 6 states consecutively. He won Idaho, Utah, Alaska, Hawaii and Washington, and those were his big wins. He won Wisconsin just yesterday but that wasn't his big but marginal win.

Despite him vouching for black communities, he's not gaining any major votes from them. This might be very counterproductive for his win. Nonetheless, based on current statistics, I see him winning nomination far from reality.

When I wrote things, it seemed to me like people are not really getting what I was trying to mean. So, as they say a picture speaks thousand words — look carefully to those I circled in the picture below.



Lets talk some delegate math.

Clinton has 1748 delegates (1279 pledged + 469 super delegates)
Bernie has 1058 delegates (1027 pledged + 31 super delegates)

It takes 2382 delegates to win nomination, now do the math yourselves.
How many delegates Clinton needs to win the nomination VS Bernie?
Clinton needs 2382 - 1748 = 634 delegates from available 4763
Bernie needs 2382 - 1058 = 1324 delegates from available 4763

Do you see the difference? Bernie needs 1324 delegates vs Clinton's 634 only.

Some of you still are skeptics about those super delegates switching sides, which happens all the time. Lets not go into too much details, let's assume all 469 super delegates suddenly switched over to Bernie's camp. Hypothetically, new count would be like this :
Clinton would have 1748 - 469 = 1279 delegates
Bernie would have 1027+31+469 = 1527 delegates

The difference Clinton losing to Bernie would be only by 1527-1279 = 248 delegates.

Even if we switch super delegates all over to Bernie, Hillary now really should be losing all states from here on, but Bernie winning big all states. That somehow might turn the table. I'm here just writing a mere speculation where I'm giving all favor to Bernie in your imagination while totally assuming Hillary is not getting any single super delegates in upcoming primaries, which is not going to happen.

Why super delegates might not switch?
On social medias, they're clearly firm on whoever they're choosing, choosing on their best interest for country. With Bernies fans, attacking super delegates and bitching about them, I don't really think they would switch the side when they consider Bernie not even a democrat but a socialist who joined the Democratic party just last year, who created obstructions and opposed Obama's policies. He was independent before that.

How Bernie can win the nomination?
-Hand out all super delegates to him
-Win "BIG" on all bigger states like NY, PA and CA (not 47% vs 53%, something like 74% vs 26%)
-Hillary loses all remaining states

Good Luck, whoever wins, must slam GOP candidate like FTW.