|
[VIEWED 2177
TIMES]
|
SAVE! for ease of future access.
|
|
|
|
Sexy In Sari
Please log in to subscribe to Sexy In Sari's postings.
Posted on 03-23-26 10:51
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NATIONAL TPS ALLIANCE; et al.,
Plaintiffs - Appellees,
v.
KRISTI NOEM; et al.,
Defendants - Appellants.
No. 25-4901
D.C. No.
3:25-cv-05687-TLT
Northern District of California,
San Francisco
ORDER
Before: HAWKINS, CALLAHAN, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
On consideration of the parties’ joint status report filed January 7, 2026
(Dkt. No. 38), and the government’s motion to vacate (Dkt. No. 40), the appeal of
the district court’s preliminary-relief ruling (Case No. 25-4901) is dismissed as
moot because the district court has entered final judgment for plaintiffs on some of
their APA claims. See generally National TPS All. v. Noem, No. 25-CV-05687-
TLT, 2025 WL 4058572 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 31, 2025). We deny the government’s
request to vacate the district court’s July 31, 2025, postponement order, National
TPS All. v. Noem, 798 F. Supp. 3d 1008 (N.D. Cal. 2025). See National TPS All. v.
Noem, No. 25-2120, 2026 WL 763614 (9th Cir. Mar. 18, 2026). The parties shall
bear their own costs. This order constitutes the mandate of this court.
FILED
MAR 23 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Oops i did it again
Please log in to subscribe to Oops i did it again's postings.
Posted on 03-23-26 11:24
PM [Snapshot: 99]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
1
?
Liked by
|
| |
सिम्पल भाषामा के भणेको हो स्यूसी जी बुझाई दिनुस न?वकीली भाषा देराई कठिन
Last edited: 23-Mar-26 11:40 PM
|
| |
|
|
logan
Please log in to subscribe to logan's postings.
Posted on 03-24-26 9:59
AM [Snapshot: 492]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
संयुक्त राज्य अमेरिकाको नवौं सर्किटको अपील अदालत नेशनल TPS एलायन्स; लगायत अन्य, वादी - अपीली प्रतिवादी, वि. क्रिस्टी नोएम; लगायत अन्य, प्रतिवादी - अपीली पक्ष। नं. 25-4901 डी.सी. नं. 3:25-cv-05687-TLT क्यालिफोर्नियाको उत्तरी जिल्ला, सान फ्रान्सिस्को आदेश समक्ष: हकिन्स, क्यालाहान, र मिलर, सर्किट न्यायाधीशहरू। जनवरी 7, 2026 मा दुवै पक्षद्वारा दायर गरिएको संयुक्त स्थिति प्रतिवेदन (Dkt. No. 38) तथा सरकारद्वारा दायर गरिएको आदेश खारेज गर्ने निवेदन (Dkt. No. 40) को विचार गर्दा, जिल्ला अदालतको प्रारम्भिक राहत सम्बन्धी निर्णय (केस नं. 25-4901) विरुद्धको अपील अब अप्रासंगिक (मूट) भएकाले खारेज गरिन्छ, किनकि जिल्ला अदालतले वादीहरूको केही APA दाबीहरूमा अन्तिम फैसला गरिसकेको छ। हेर्नुहोस्: National TPS All. v. Noem, नं. 25-CV-05687-TLT, 2025 WL 4058572 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 31, 2025)। हामी सरकारको जुलाई 31, 2025 को स्थगन आदेश खारेज गर्ने अनुरोध अस्वीकार गर्दछौं (National TPS All. v. Noem, 798 F. Supp. 3d 1008 (N.D. Cal. 2025))। हेर्नुहोस्: National TPS All. v. Noem, नं. 25-2120, 2026 WL 763614 (9th Cir. Mar. 18, 2026)। दुवै पक्षले आफ्ना खर्चहरू आफैं वहन गर्नेछन्। यो आदेश नै यस अदालतको अन्तिम निर्देश (mandate) हो। दर्ता गरिएको: मार्च 23, 2026 मौली सी. ड्वायर, क्लर्क
|
| |
|
|
Oops i did it again
Please log in to subscribe to Oops i did it again's postings.
Posted on 03-24-26 11:00
AM [Snapshot: 661]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
तपैकों पेच ढीला हो की के हो ट्रान्सलेट गर्र भन्या हैन नी. जिस्ट के हों भनेर बुझना खोज्या
|
| |
|
|
amazing-1122
Please log in to subscribe to amazing-1122's postings.
Posted on 03-24-26 12:17
PM [Snapshot: 845]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
kehena kya chahateh ho...
|
| |
|
|
Oops i did it again
Please log in to subscribe to Oops i did it again's postings.
Posted on 03-24-26 2:10
PM [Snapshot: 1071]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
भानेपछी प्रोटेक्शन यथावत नई छ हुईन??
|
| |
|
|
Jindagi yestai chha
Please log in to subscribe to Jindagi yestai chha's postings.
Posted on 03-24-26 9:08
PM [Snapshot: 1466]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
The meaning is “its over”
|
| |
|
|
Hanuman1
Please log in to subscribe to Hanuman1's postings.
Posted on 03-25-26 9:42
AM [Snapshot: 1835]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
1
?
Liked by
|
| |
In simple language it means Appeal in the Supreme Court is dismissed .Appeal dismissed is not equal to case dismissed .for now old decision of lower court stays .so, lower court was in favour of tps .Good news for now. No loss of TPS benefits right now. No sudden risk now.But still uncertain in the long run…
|
| |
|
|
Kaji khadka
Please log in to subscribe to Kaji khadka's postings.
Posted on 03-25-26 10:11
AM [Snapshot: 1888]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
is there something i can show at my job to prove that TPS is still intact?
|
| |
|
|
Oops i did it again
Please log in to subscribe to Oops i did it again's postings.
Posted on 03-25-26 1:32
PM [Snapshot: 2138]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
काजी साप काम तिर यो चुढ़िनई सकेको चंगाले मद्दत गर्च जस्तों मलाई लागदैन . टढाई गर्दा केही हुदैन गुडलॉक अब ६-७ मैना कुरनुस क्लीन स्विप हुन लाको छ . यो बिसयमाँ के भन्न चानू हुंच?
|
| |
|
|