[Show all top banners]

Sexy In Sari
Replies to this thread:

More by Sexy In Sari
What people are reading
Subscribers
:: Subscribe
Back to: Kurakani General Refresh page to view new replies
 Nepal TPS on Hold: A Courtroom Drama
[VIEWED 1161 TIMES]
SAVE! for ease of future access.
Posted on 07-12-25 1:53 PM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

The Nepal TPS lawyer urged the court, “Let’s speed this up. We need to pause the rule so the August 5 effective date is put on hold and people can keep working.”

Catherine Ross, the DHS attorney from the Venezuela case, jumped in, “Not so fast—there’s no way. The court should take its time, like in other cases. I’ll be representing this case from now on.”

Judge Thompson looked at both lawyers and said, “Government, file your opposition motion by July 14. Nepal TPS counsel, you have until July 18 to respond. In any case, the hearing will be on July 29, and I will decide then.”



Disclaimer:
This is an embellished story based on factual filings of court documents in the public record July 11, 2025
Last edited: 12-Jul-25 02:37 PM

 
Posted on 07-12-25 4:41 PM     [Snapshot: 224]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

Another 18 months extension
 
Posted on 07-12-25 11:06 PM     [Snapshot: 558]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

@Jindagi yestai chha:

The lawsuit does NOT ask for any 6-, 12-, or 18-month TPS extensions for Nepal or any other country.
In the 57 pages of complaint, the word "extension" is used only 8 times.

The lawyer asks the judge to do eight things to TPS holders. And you won't find the word "extensions" on those requests.

So now the question is, what is this case really about?

If you see the first cover page of the lawsuit, on the bottom right side under "Complaint," you'll see "APA Case." This is an APA case. (google what is APA.)

This lawsuit is asking the court to check whether govt. agency followed the required legal steps,
and paperwork when making decisions.

That's it.

 
Posted on 07-12-25 11:50 PM     [Snapshot: 640]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

Thankyou for clarifying . My question is When termination attempt was challenged in court and blocked by litigation from immigration advocates, didnt it lead to extension for another 18 months during trump administration? What is the difference between now ? Please correct me if i am wrong .
 


Please Log in! to be able to reply! If you don't have a login, please register here.

YOU CAN ALSO



IN ORDER TO POST!




Within last 30 days
Recommended Popular Threads Controvertial Threads
#MAGA#FAFO is delicious
Democrat lies revealed
2020 : Why No Trump !
Medication from Nepal to USA
Nepal TPS Hearing: 9 Room, 19 Floor, 29 July
A legit Non-Profit organization "United For TPS Nepal "
Nepal TPS Extension Possible as Court Reviews Late Notice Issue
Bill to Protect TPS and DED Recipients
कोर्टमा जाँदा आइसले समात्ला भन्ने डर छ भने यस्तो गर्नुहोला
NOTE: The opinions here represent the opinions of the individual posters, and not of Sajha.com. It is not possible for sajha.com to monitor all the postings, since sajha.com merely seeks to provide a cyber location for discussing ideas and concerns related to Nepal and the Nepalis. Please send an email to admin@sajha.com using a valid email address if you want any posting to be considered for deletion. Your request will be handled on a one to one basis. Sajha.com is a service please don't abuse it. - Thanks.

Sajha.com Privacy Policy

Like us in Facebook!

↑ Back to Top
free counters